VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRENSHAW NURSING HOME

CRENSHAW NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRENSHAW NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Los Angeles  vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have Los Angeles
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 1900 S LONGWOOD AVE  
Zip Code 90016  
Phone 3239331560  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
55  (53.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
49  (42.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
49  (42.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.21  (0.37 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.74  (0.15 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 05/04/2009
date Of Correction: 05/04/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.5 % (2.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.7 % (27.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4 % (39.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.3 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.8 % (13.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 % (3.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.3 % (3.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.6 % (1.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (37.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.7 % (12.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.7 % (9.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 9.4 / 10.4 % 


Scroll To Top

saved