VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C

CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRESTPARK MARIANNA, L L C VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MARIANNA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MARIANNA
State attribute explanation AR   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AR
Street 700 WEST CHESTNUT  
Zip Code 72360  
Phone 8702953466  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
140  (31.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
51  (40.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
36 % (47.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 01/26/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 12/10/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/22/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 01/26/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 01/26/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 12/10/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.7 % (12.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.3 % (5.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
17.6 % (5.02 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.8 % (7.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.4 % (36.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 % (11.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.7 % (10.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 % (5.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.4 % (5.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.6 % (7.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.2 % (13.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.5 % (3.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2 % (8.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.3 % (31.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
23.3 % (12.57 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9 % (17.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
43.9 % (30.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved