VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRESTVIEW HEALTHCARE RESIDENCE LTD

CRESTVIEW HEALTHCARE RESIDENCE LTD

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRESTVIEW HEALTHCARE RESIDENCE LTD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WACO   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have WACO
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1400 LAKE SHORE DR  
Zip Code 76708  
Phone 2547530291  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
192  (83.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
117  (25.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
61 % (22.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/28/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
127  (35.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.36  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.58  (1.01 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 09/29/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/04/2009
date Of Correction: 12/04/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/29/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/10/2010
date Of Correction: 03/15/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Use A Registered Nurse At Least 8 Hours A Day, 7 Days A Week.
survey Date: 09/29/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 07/29/2010
date Of Correction: 08/23/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/10/2010
date Of Correction: 03/15/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
42.4 % (17.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.7 % (29.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.5 % (8.84 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.6-28 % (1.02 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19 % (25.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9 % (6.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
37.7 % (9.32 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
11.2-20 % (32.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.5 % (10.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.2 % (0.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
44.3 % (18.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (20.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 % (9.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2 % (4.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9 % (21.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.3 % (0.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
29.1 % (9.24 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
14.4 % (24.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9 % (9.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.9 % (8.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
27.3 % (54.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.7 % (4.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.3 % (10.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved