VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRESTWOOD CARE CENTRE

CRESTWOOD CARE CENTRE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRESTWOOD CARE CENTRE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CRESTWOOD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CRESTWOOD
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 14255 SOUTH CICERO AVENUE  
Zip Code 60445  
Phone 7083710400  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
0303 123 1371  (194.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
234  (142.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
77 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/1/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/13/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
11  (3.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/28/2012
date Of Correction: 07/20/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/22/2010
date Of Correction: 07/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/03/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/29/2009
date Of Correction: 05/22/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 11/30/2010
date Of Correction: 12/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/23/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.
survey Date: 09/30/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/30/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/03/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/30/2009
date Of Correction: 10/23/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.5 % (1.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.2 % (11.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.4 % (0.82 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (4.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.5 % (10.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 % (11.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.50 % (11.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (21.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (41.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.4 % (14.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.4 % (15.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 % (13.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.8 % (0.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.7 % (6.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.2 % (4.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.5 % (10.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 % (15.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.8 % (34.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.9 (64.2) % (6.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.6 % (18.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.4 % (24.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved