VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRESTWOOD TERRACE NURSING CTR

CRESTWOOD TERRACE NURSING CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRESTWOOD TERRACE NURSING CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CRESTWOOD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CRESTWOOD
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 13301 SOUTH CENTRAL AVENUE  
Zip Code 60445  
Phone 7085975251  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
126  (17.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
126  (34.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
100 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/14/2011  
Fire Survey Date 3/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
126  (34.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.59 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.28  (0.56 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (1.14 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/16/2011
date Of Correction: 01/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/01/2011
date Of Correction: 04/04/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/07/2009
date Of Correction: 07/08/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/18/2010
date Of Correction: 02/19/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/16/2011
date Of Correction: 01/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 02/18/2010
date Of Correction: 02/19/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 11/25/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/18/2010
date Of Correction: 02/19/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 12/16/2011
date Of Correction: 01/13/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
71.8 % (46.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.5 % (13.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.9 % (10.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
4.5 % (40.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.2 % (21.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
72.8 % (47.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.20 % (11.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.6 % (7.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.9 % (39.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.8 % (37.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 % (13.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82 % (7.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved