DEANWOOD REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Washington	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Washington
State attribute explanation	DC	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have DC	compare DC Nursing Homes USA
Street	5000 BURROUGHS AVE. NE
Zip Code	20019
Phone	2023997504
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	296 (187.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (296)
Total Number of Residents	269 (177.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (269)
Percent of Occupied Beds	91 % (7.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (91) %
Health Survey Date	3/28/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/29/2012
Sprinkler Status	Partially Sprinklered	vs	8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	3 (55.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	6 (50.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	25

Staff Information
Number of Residents	269 (177.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.36 (0.41 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.26 (0.42 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.63 (0.04 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (5.43 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely. survey Date: 12/01/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/01/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/26/2009 date Of Correction: 08/21/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 12/01/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization. survey Date: 11/08/2011 date Of Correction: 12/12/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/14/2010 date Of Correction: 07/07/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 09/16/2009 date Of Correction: 10/24/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/15/2009 date Of Correction: 05/07/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 01/17/2012 date Of Correction: 03/06/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/06/2012 date Of Correction: 01/30/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 07/19/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/19/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 07/09/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/16/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors See A Resident's Plan Of Care At Every Visit And Make Notes About Progress And Orders In Writing. survey Date: 11/18/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/06/2012 date Of Correction: 01/30/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/19/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator. survey Date: 07/19/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/19/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator. survey Date: 12/01/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 12/01/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 12/01/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 11/18/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 11/18/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009
Deficiency #10		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/26/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	34.4 % (9.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	0.4 % (16.26 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	16 % (3.42 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.1 % (7.73 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	51.5 % (6.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.9 % (8.56 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	6.1 % (22.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.4 % (43.28 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	4.8 % (20.22 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	40.9 % (43.74 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	39.6 % (44.34 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13.2 % (32.7 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.6 % (11.92 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	32 % (6.61 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.9 % (11.2 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	14.2 % (4.98 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.8 % (3.7 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	49.5 % (6.12 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.4 % (6.18 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.6 % (15.26 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.8 % (37.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.9 % (13.86 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	41.6 % (39.84 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	35.6 % (39.15 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	12.4-2413.6-24 % (4.94 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %