VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > DEERFIELD BEACH HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

DEERFIELD BEACH HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
DEERFIELD BEACH HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City POMPANO BEACH   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have POMPANO BEACH
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 401 EAST SAMPLE ROAD  
Zip Code 33064  
Phone 9549414100  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
194  (85.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
141  (49.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/26/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/24/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Other  vs 1.9% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Other
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 11  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
141  (49.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/23/2009
date Of Correction: 01/23/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/28/2010
date Of Correction: 01/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 08/10/2009
date Of Correction: 09/14/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/18/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/27/2012
date Of Correction: 04/18/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/20/2010
date Of Correction: 01/31/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/02/2010
date Of Correction: 07/02/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 09/11/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 06/12/2012
date Of Correction: 06/29/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 06/12/2012
date Of Correction: 06/29/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 06/12/2012
date Of Correction: 06/29/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.7 % (1.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9 % (15.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2 % (7.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.2 % (0.34 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 % (12.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 % (10.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (41.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 % (13.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.1 % (14.46 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.4 % (15.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 % (43.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.6 % (0.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7 % (12.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 % (1.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.1 % (3.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2 % (6.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (36.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9 % (15.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.4 % (21.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.4 % (8.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved