VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > DELAWARE VETERANS HOME

DELAWARE VETERANS HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
DELAWARE VETERANS HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MILFORD   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have MILFORD
State attribute explanation DE   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have DE
Street 100 DELAWARE VETERAN'S DRIVE  
Zip Code 19963  
Phone 3024246000  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
108  (16.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/18/2011  
Fire Survey Date 4/19/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - State  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 16  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
108  (16.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.50  (0.73 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.20  (0.61 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 07/07/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/26/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 07/07/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 05/26/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (10.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.3 % (5.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.8 % (7.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 % (40.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (13.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.4 % (10.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.7 % (2.6 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (6.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 % (3.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (6.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 % (19.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.1 % (36.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
15.1 % (4.37 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95 % (20.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved