Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
DELAWARE VETERANS HOME | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
108 (16.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.50 (0.73 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.7 (0.14 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
2.20 (0.61 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (5.44 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.05 (0.05 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 02/03/2011 date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 02/03/2011 date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/14/2011 date Of Correction: 07/07/2011 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 02/03/2011 date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/03/2011 date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 04/14/2011 date Of Correction: 07/07/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 02/03/2011 date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 |
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 01/04/2012 date Of Correction: 03/08/2012 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
14.3 % (10.79 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
11.3 % (5.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
5.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
36.8 % (7.74 % lower than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 8.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
2.8 % (40.88 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
1 (44.9 lower than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.9 % (13.62 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
14.4 % (10.99 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
16.7 % (2.6 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
3.2 % (6.02 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5 % (3.5 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
50 % (6.62 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.9:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
0.6 % (19.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
2.1 % (36.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
15.1 % (4.37 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
95 % (20.25 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|