VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > DESERT MANOR

DESERT MANOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
DESERT MANOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City YUCCA VALLEY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have YUCCA VALLEY
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 8515 CHOLLA AVE  
Zip Code 92284  
Phone 7603650717  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
58  (50.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
49  (42.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/20/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/22/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
49  (42.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Put Firmly Secured Handrails On Each Side Of Hallways.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 09/14/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Special Eating Equipment And Utensils For Each Resident Who Needs Them.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.1 % (10.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5 % (4.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5 % (5.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
42.9 % (0.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
60 % (23.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.3 % (12.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8 % (9.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (6.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 % (3.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 % (0.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6 % (16.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
52.7 % (14.17 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (0.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.6 % (5.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24.1 % (50.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved