DESERT SPRINGS HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	INDIO	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have INDIO
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	82-262 VALENCIA AVENUE
Zip Code	92201
Phone	7603476000
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	68 (40.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (68)
Total Number of Residents	61 (30.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (61)
Percent of Occupied Beds	90 % (6.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (90) %
Health Survey Date	5/20/2011
Fire Survey Date	6/3/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8 (0.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	55 (36.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.77 (equals average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.89 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.66 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Automatic Sprinkler Systems Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Automatic Sprinkler Systems That Have Been Maintained In Working Order. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Hazardous Area Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Construction That Can Resist Fire For One Hour Or An Approved Fire Extinguishing System. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Exits and Egress Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Corridors Or Aisles That Are Unobstructed And Are At Least 8 Feet In Width. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Electrical Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Installed Electrical Wiring And Equipment. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Smoke Compartmentation and Control Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Smoke Barrier Doors That Can Resist Smoke For At Least 20 Minutes. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Walls Or Barriers That Prevent Smoke From Passing Through And Would Resist Fire For At Least One Hour. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Corridor Walls and Doors Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Corridor And Hallway Doors That Block Smoke. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Illumination and Emergency Power Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Located And Lighted ""exit"" Signs. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 01/13/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	24.5 % (0.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1 % (31.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.4 % (2.18 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.8 % (8.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.2 % (11.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9.6 % (3.86 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	25 % (3.38 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.9-24 % (8.12 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	81.7 % (2.94 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.7 % (14.76 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.3 % (6.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.4 % (23.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.1 % (1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.8 % (1.58 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7 % (1.5 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	59.3 % (15.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.3 % (6.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.7 % (3.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	25.3 % (5.44 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.9 % (36.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.1 % (7.63 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.8 % (7.96 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	71.1 % (10.34 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	94.4 % (19.65 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	20.4 % (3.06 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %