VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > EDEN VILLAGE CARE CENTER

EDEN VILLAGE CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
EDEN VILLAGE CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City GLEN CARBON   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GLEN CARBON
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 400 SOUTH STATION ROAD  
Zip Code 62034  
Phone 6182885014  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
128  (19.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
91  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
71 % (12.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/30/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/30/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(54.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(51.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 16  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
91  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.4  (0.37 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.2  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/08/2010
date Of Correction: 01/04/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 08/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/28/2010
date Of Correction: 04/23/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/01/2009
date Of Correction: 06/20/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 11/10/2010
date Of Correction: 12/28/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 01/28/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 08/11/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/11/2010
date Of Correction: 08/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/28/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 01/28/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/28/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 % (1.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (30.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.6 % (9.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.9 % (1.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 % (12.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3 % (27.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.3 % (0.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.6 % (2.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.5 % (6.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8 % (7.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.7 % (0.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8 % (8.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 % (0.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1 % (2.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.7 % (2.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.7 % (0.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.6 % (3.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.8 % (3.96 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85 % (3.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.8 % (15.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.8 % (1.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved