VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > EDINBURG NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

EDINBURG NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
EDINBURG NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City EDINBURG   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have EDINBURG
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 5215 S SUGAR RD  
Zip Code 78539  
Phone 9567829666  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
111  (19.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.6  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.48  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 01/13/2012
date Of Correction: 02/24/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
37.9 % (12.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.9 (55.2) % (0.32 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4 % (7.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.2 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4 % (39.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
18.9 % (65.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
16.2 % (67.74 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (14.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.5 % (15.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.8 % (7.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7 % (2.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.2 % (4.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (5.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8 % (18.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (35.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.8 % (8.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
28.5 % (52.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
25.9 % (48.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
30.9 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved