VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ELISABETH SEV PRENTISS CTR FOR

ELISABETH SEV PRENTISS CTR FOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ELISABETH SEV PRENTISS CTR FOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CLEVELAND   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have CLEVELAND
State attribute explanation OH   vs 6.2% Nursing Homes USA have OH
Street 3525 SCRANTON ROAD  
Zip Code 44109  
Phone 2169578098  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
147  (55.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/26/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/23/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
147  (55.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.3 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.84  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5 % (7.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5 % (14.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.5 % (4.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (13.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.8 % (3.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8 % (26.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (8.82 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.9 % (10.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97 % (13.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (13.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.5-24 % (5.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.5 % (19.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.2 % (8.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.7 % (1.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (9.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 % (19.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.8 % (37.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.8 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.6 % (13.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.1 % (19.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16.4 % (0.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved