VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > EMILY P. BISSELL HOSPITAL

EMILY P. BISSELL HOSPITAL

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
EMILY P. BISSELL HOSPITAL VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WILMINGTON   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have WILMINGTON
State attribute explanation DE   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have DE
Street 3000 NEWPORT GAP PIKE  
Zip Code 19808  
Phone 3029958482  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
78  (13.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
78 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/7/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - State  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 18  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
78  (13.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.63  (0.86 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.27  (0.43 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.89  (1.3 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/31/2011
date Of Correction: 06/24/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 09/23/2009
date Of Correction: 12/17/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 07/07/2011
date Of Correction: 08/19/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/04/2012
date Of Correction: 06/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 01/03/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/23/2009
date Of Correction: 02/01/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/23/2009
date Of Correction: 02/01/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 01/03/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 05/31/2011
date Of Correction: 06/24/2011 

Miscellaneous Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Other Fire Safety Features Required By Fire Safety Codes.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (11.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.6 % (1.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 % (6.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.5 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 % (9.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4 % (26.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.4 % (2.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8 % (8.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 % (1.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.7 % (29.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 % (17.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7.6 % (30.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved