VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ESPANOLA VALLEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER

ESPANOLA VALLEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ESPANOLA VALLEY NURSING & REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ESPANOLA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ESPANOLA
State attribute explanation NM   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NM
Street 720 HACIENDA STREET  
Zip Code 87532  
Phone 5057536769  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
89  (2.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
74 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/24/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
89  (2.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.68  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.11  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Receive Registry Verification That A Nurse Aide Has Met The Required Training And Skills That The State Requires; And 2) Ensure Nurse Aides Receive The Required Retraining After 24 Months If Nursing Related Services Were Not Provided For Monetary Compensation
survey Date: 02/07/2012
date Of Correction: 05/23/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 23.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.8 % (6.97 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.3 % (15.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 % (14.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5 % (9.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.2 % (11.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.9 % (6.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
13.8 % (70.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
12.4-2413.6-24 % (71.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (42.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2 % (12.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.4 % (7.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.8 % (7.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
19.2 % (10.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.5 % (8.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5 % (4.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.8 % (5.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
8 % (30.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (7.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.7 % (12.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
8.8 % (72.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 11.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.5 % (8.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved