EXCEL REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	TAMPA	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have TAMPA
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	2811 CAMPUS HILL DR
Zip Code	33612
Phone	8139799400
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	105 (13.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (105)
Percent of Occupied Beds	88 % (4.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (88) %
Health Survey Date	4/6/2012
Fire Survey Date	4/6/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	19

Staff Information
Number of Residents	105 (13.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.85 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.92 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.77 (0.18 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.18 (5.31 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.18 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition. survey Date: 05/18/2010 date Of Correction: 05/19/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area. survey Date: 11/17/2009 date Of Correction: 12/16/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization. survey Date: 04/25/2012 date Of Correction: 05/06/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Protect Current Or Future Residents From Giving Up Their Medicaid Or Medicare Benefits; Or 2) Follow Federal Rules For Admissions. survey Date: 11/15/2011 date Of Correction: 12/15/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization. survey Date: 11/15/2011 date Of Correction: 12/15/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 08/15/2011 date Of Correction: 09/15/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Private Space Is Available In The Nursing Home For Resident Groups Or Residents' Families To Meet. survey Date: 05/16/2011 date Of Correction: 06/14/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home. survey Date: 05/16/2011 date Of Correction: 06/14/2011
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Let The Resident Refuse Treatment Or Refuse To Take Part In An Experiment And Formulate Advance Directives. survey Date: 03/03/2011 date Of Correction: 04/03/2011
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 02/12/2010 date Of Correction: 03/08/2010
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 06/22/2009 date Of Correction: 06/23/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/06/2012 date Of Correction: 05/06/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 11/15/2011 date Of Correction: 12/15/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/01/2010 date Of Correction: 12/01/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 11/01/2010 date Of Correction: 12/01/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 02/12/2010 date Of Correction: 03/08/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/12/2010 date Of Correction: 03/08/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/12/2010 date Of Correction: 03/08/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have An Agreement With At Least One Or More Hospitals Certified By Medicare Or Medicaid To Make Sure Residents Can Be Moved Quickly To The Hospital When They Need Medical Care. survey Date: 08/17/2010 date Of Correction: 09/16/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.2 % (5.89 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (32.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.7 % (9.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.6 % (5.98 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	17.6 % (5.77 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.4 % (6.06 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	13.2 % (30.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	29.3 % (4.28 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.9 % (9.26 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	94.4 % (10.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	24.8 % (0.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.6 % (6.5 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.9 % (4.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	56.4 % (13.02 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	15.5 % (23.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25.5 % (0.74 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.2 % (11.76 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	96.2 % (21.45 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13.8 % (3.54 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %