FAIR ACRES GERIATRIC CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LIMA	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LIMA
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	340 N. MIDDLETOWN ROAD
Zip Code	19037
Phone	6108915700
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	908 (799.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (908)
Total Number of Residents	892 (800.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (892)
Percent of Occupied Beds	98 % (14.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (98) %
Health Survey Date	4/30/2012
Fire Survey Date	4/10/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Government - County	vs	2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County	compare Government - County Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18 (10.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	892 (800.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.54 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.79 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.33 (0.26 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (5.45 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 10/14/2011 date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/21/2011 date Of Correction: 03/10/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/02/2009 date Of Correction: 12/17/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed. survey Date: 03/06/2012 date Of Correction: 03/23/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 02/09/2012 date Of Correction: 03/12/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Determine If It Is Safe For The Resident To Self-administer Drugs. survey Date: 03/29/2010 date Of Correction: 04/23/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 10/18/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/18/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/18/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/02/2010 date Of Correction: 04/23/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 12/02/2009 date Of Correction: 12/17/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting. survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/18/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/21/2011 date Of Correction: 03/10/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/15/2009 date Of Correction: 11/20/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 03/29/2010 date Of Correction: 04/23/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	38.2 % (13.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2 % (30.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.8 % (6.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.4 % (3.43 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	54.3 % (9.76 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.3 % (13.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.3 % (11.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.4 % (25.98 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.1 % (43.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.3 % (6.72 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	78.4 % (6.24 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	81.3 % (2.64 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	37.3 % (11.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.4 % (22.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.9 % (3.2 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.1 % (4.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	10.2 % (1.7 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	52.7 % (9.32 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2 % (8.65 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.7 % (17.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.1 % (38.43 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.5 % (9.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	80.3 % (1.14 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	83.9 % (9.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	14 % (3.34 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %