VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > FAIR HAVENS CENTER

FAIR HAVENS CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
FAIR HAVENS CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MIAMI SPRINGS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MIAMI SPRINGS
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 201 CURTISS PKWY  
Zip Code 33166  
Phone 3058871565  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
269  (160.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
268  (176.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
100 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/15/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/15/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
268  (176.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.3  (0.47 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.13  (0.29 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 06/22/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 09/26/2011
date Of Correction: 09/29/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/04/2012
date Of Correction: 04/05/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/29/2010
date Of Correction: 03/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 01/29/2010
date Of Correction: 03/09/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/26/2011
date Of Correction: 09/29/2011 

Exits and Egress Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Exits That Are Accessible At All Times.
survey Date: 05/10/2010
date Of Correction: 06/22/2010 

Furnishings and Decorations Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Exits That Are Free From Obstructions And Can Be Used At All Times.
survey Date: 05/10/2010
date Of Correction: 06/22/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.4 % (15.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4 % (14.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58 % (13.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1 % (23.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.8 % (4.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.7 % (4.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
42 % (16.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2 % (12.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.1 % (9.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 % (7.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.1 % (19.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.1 % (38.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 % (23.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5 % (0.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.6 % (4.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.9 % (10.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved