VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > FARWELL CONVALESCENT CENTER

FARWELL CONVALESCENT CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
FARWELL CONVALESCENT CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FARWELL   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have FARWELL
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 305 FIFTH ST  
Zip Code 79325  
Phone 8064819027  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
75  (33.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
44  (47.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/30/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - Hospital District  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - Hospital district
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
60  (31.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.87  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.24  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35 % (9.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.6 % (7.94 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5 % (8.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3 % (26.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.5 % (3.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
64.3 % (19.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.7 % (6.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.6 % (20.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28 % (13.9 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4 % (1.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.8 % (7.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.4 % (6.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 % (0.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 % (19.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (9.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.6 % (4.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.7 % (2.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.3 % (1.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.8 % (13.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved