VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > FLETCHER HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

FLETCHER HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
FLETCHER HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TAMPA   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have TAMPA
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 518 W FLETCHER AVE  
Zip Code 33612  
Phone 8132651600  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
110  (18.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
92 % (8.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/5/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 11  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
110  (18.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
(0.16 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (5.29 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 05/07/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/05/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 08/05/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 04/13/2011
date Of Correction: 05/06/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Let Residents Voice A Complaint Or Grievance Without Being Treated Differently Or Badly.
survey Date: 12/20/2010
date Of Correction: 01/11/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/29/2011
date Of Correction: 09/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/29/2011
date Of Correction: 09/05/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 04/13/2011
date Of Correction: 05/06/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/28/2009
date Of Correction: 09/28/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 05/01/2009
date Of Correction: 05/20/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/01/2009
date Of Correction: 05/20/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.4 % (4.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (32.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.4 % (3.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.5 % (0.92 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.3 % (13.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.6 % (5.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.4 % (1.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.6 % (24.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61.4 % (22.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.7 % (1.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (4.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.4 % (4.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5 % (equals average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.4 % (18.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 % (0.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.1 % (36.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (9.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.7 % (8.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.9 % (11.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.5 % (4.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.3 % (9.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved