FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL CARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	BLANDING	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have BLANDING
State attribute explanation	UT	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT	compare UT Nursing Homes USA
Street	818 NORTH 400 WEST
Zip Code	84511
Phone	4356782251
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	104 (4.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (104)
Total Number of Residents	64 (27.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (64)
Percent of Occupied Beds	62 % (21.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (62) %
Health Survey Date	8/4/2011
Fire Survey Date	8/2/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	64 (27.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.75 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.65 (0.19 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.41 (0.18 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.09 (5.4 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.09 (0.01 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 10/04/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	34.6 % (9.51 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.6 (65.5) % (1.94 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.1 % (5.48 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1.9 % (9.93 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.7 % (10.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9.3 % (4.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.9 % (26.48 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	18.5 % (25.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	20 % (64.64 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	30 % (53.94 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.9 % (13.62 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	32.1 % (6.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3.4 % (20.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16 % (1.9 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.7 % (2.52 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	0.6 % (7.9 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	15.4 % (27.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.9 % (5.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9.6 % (0.02 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.2 % (18.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	14.5 % (24.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	41.9 % (17.14 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	11.5 % (69.94 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	20.9 % (53.85 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.4 % (14.94 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %