VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > FOX GLOVE COURT CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

FOX GLOVE COURT CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
FOX GLOVE COURT CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ATLANTA   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ATLANTA
State attribute explanation GA   vs 2.3% Nursing Homes USA have GA
Street 2850 SPRINGDALE ROAD SW  
Zip Code 30315  
Phone 4047628672  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
109  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
99  (7.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 9  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99  (7.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.55  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.48  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/03/2012
date Of Correction: 05/21/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 03/15/2011
date Of Correction: 04/19/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/13/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/15/2011
date Of Correction: 04/19/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Follow Policies And Procedures To Convey The Resident's Personal Funds To The Appropriate Party Responsible After The Resident's Death.
survey Date: 06/16/2010
date Of Correction: 07/01/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/14/2011
date Of Correction: 01/13/2012 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 06/24/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/18/2010
date Of Correction: 09/13/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 04/19/2011
date Of Correction: 05/09/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.3 % (15.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.8 % (26.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.8 (82.0) % (11.14 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
20 % (7.42 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.2 % (12.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
78.3 % (49.92 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.1 % (40.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.9 % (6.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.1 % (18.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 % (6.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 % (44 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.4 % (11.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.4 % (12.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
20.4 % (11.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.1 (71.8) % (21.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.6 % (1.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
69.6 % (49.74 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (36.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 % (6.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.4 % (9.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.9 % (23.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.4 % (1.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (13.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved