VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > FREEPORT NURSING & REHAB CENTER

FREEPORT NURSING & REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
FREEPORT NURSING & REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FREEPORT   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have FREEPORT
State attribute explanation ME   vs 0.7% Nursing Homes USA have ME
Street 3  
Zip Code 4032  
Phone 2078654713  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
65  (43.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
55  (36.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
85 % (1.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/4/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
55  (36.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.57  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.2  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 01/11/2011
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 02/19/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 01/11/2011
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 01/11/2011
date Of Correction: 01/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 04/28/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 02/19/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 01/11/2011
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 01/11/2011
date Of Correction: 02/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 06/15/2009
date Of Correction: 07/03/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 06/15/2009
date Of Correction: 07/03/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40 % (14.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7 % (25.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.3 % (1.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.5 % (0.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14 % (2.17 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12 % (1.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 % (22.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.3 % (2.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.1 % (10.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75 % (8.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4 % (11.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.4 % (11.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (21 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6 % (3.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.8 % (5.58 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.9-28 % (6.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 % (13.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.5 % (0.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.8 % (16.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 10.7:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.7 % (14.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved