GILL ODD FELLOWS HOME | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

GILL ODD FELLOWS HOME

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Ludlow	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have Ludlow
State attribute explanation	VT	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have VT	compare VT Nursing Homes USA
Street	8 GILL TERRACE
Zip Code	5149
Phone	8022284571
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	46 (62.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (46)
Total Number of Residents	32 (59.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (32)
Percent of Occupied Beds	70 % (13.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (70) %
Health Survey Date	3/14/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/14/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	20 (12.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	32 (59.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.94 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.68 (0.16 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.62 (0.03 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (5.43 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 03/18/2010 date Of Correction: 05/07/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Send And Promptly Deliver Unopened Mail To Residents. survey Date: 02/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/15/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States. survey Date: 03/18/2010 date Of Correction: 05/07/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home. survey Date: 06/23/2009 date Of Correction: 07/15/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 06/23/2009 date Of Correction: 07/15/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/15/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/29/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Proper Treatment And Assistive Devices To Maintain Their Vision And Hearing. survey Date: 09/09/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 09/09/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/22/2009 date Of Correction: 05/01/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Check And Assess Each Resident's Assessment At Least Every 3 Months. survey Date: 02/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/15/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 03/18/2010 date Of Correction: 05/07/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 03/18/2010 date Of Correction: 05/07/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 03/18/2010 date Of Correction: 05/07/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 04/22/2009 date Of Correction: 05/01/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	34.4 % (9.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3 % (13.66 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4 % (11.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	11.4 % (2.06 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.9 % (40.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	30.5 % (5.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.20 % (11.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.4 % (6.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.7 % (0.2 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	53.3 % (9.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.3 % (9.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.7 % (0.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1 % (37.53 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	29.9 % (19.17 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.2 % (19.56 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (18.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.4 % (23.65 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %