GLENCLIFF HOME FOR THE ELDERLY

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	GLENCLIFF	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have GLENCLIFF
State attribute explanation	NH	vs	0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NH	compare NH Nursing Homes USA
Street	393 HIGH STREET
Zip Code	3238
Phone	6039893111
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	130 (21.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (130)
Total Number of Residents	118 (26.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (118)
Percent of Occupied Beds	91 % (7.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (91) %
Health Survey Date	11/7/2011
Fire Survey Date	11/7/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicaid	vs	3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid	compare Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Government - State	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State	compare Government - State Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	10 (2.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	118 (26.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.64 (0.13 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.75 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.39 (0.2 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	75.2 (69.71 higher than average)	vs	5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Designed, Built, Equipped, Or Well Kept To Protect The Health And Safety Of Residents, Workers, And The Public. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 08/31/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 08/31/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 03/05/2012 date Of Correction: 04/16/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 03/05/2012 date Of Correction: 04/16/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 09/26/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 09/26/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 09/26/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 08/31/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 09/26/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 06/30/2011 date Of Correction: 09/26/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	79.6 % (54.51 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27.7 % (11.04 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3.7 % (8.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.3 % (7.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	39.7 % (4.84 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.6 % (8.03 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7 % (6.46 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	32.2 % (3.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	8.7 % (34.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.2 % (10.32 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	78.5 % (53.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.8 % (12.7 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	1.9 % (7.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.3 % (6.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	38.5 % (4.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.3 % (5.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	31.2 % (11.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	8.2 % (30.33 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.4 % (6.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	59.1 % (34.34 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	90 % (8.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	73.1 % (1.65 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %