GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-MUNCIE

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	MUNCIE	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have MUNCIE
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	2701 LYN-MAR DR
Zip Code	47304
Phone	7652865979
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	117 (8.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (117)
Total Number of Residents	101 (9.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (101)
Percent of Occupied Beds	86 % (2.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (86) %
Health Survey Date	7/29/2011
Fire Survey Date	8/11/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6 (1.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	101 (9.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.6 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.74 (0.1 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.34 (0.25 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (5.43 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/01/2009 date Of Correction: 05/31/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 05/01/2009 date Of Correction: 05/31/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 05/01/2009 date Of Correction: 05/31/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 07/08/2009 date Of Correction: 07/17/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 05/01/2009 date Of Correction: 05/31/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 05/01/2009 date Of Correction: 05/31/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.5 % (3.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	1.50 % (15.16 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	1.7 % (10.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	64.5 % (19.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.1 % (42.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.2 % (9.82 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	79.2 % (5.44 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	70.8 % (13.14 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	24.1 % (1.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.6 % (10.5 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.4 % (6.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	66.3 % (22.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.3 % (38.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.9-24 % (7.86 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	81.9 % (0.46 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	76.7 % (1.95 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	16.7 % (0.64 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %