VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-RICHMOND

GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-RICHMOND

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-RICHMOND VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Richmond  vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Richmond
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 1042  
Zip Code 47374  
Phone 7659667788  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
122  (13.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
92  (0.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
75 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/9/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
92  (0.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
(0.23 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.6  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.6  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/04/2010
date Of Correction: 03/18/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/24/2011
date Of Correction: 11/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/24/2011
date Of Correction: 11/07/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/01/2012
date Of Correction: 04/08/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 03/01/2012
date Of Correction: 04/08/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.2 % (6.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8 % (4.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.7 % (22.16 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (12.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (8.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4 % (26.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.7 % (0.68 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90 % (5.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.9 % (5.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.3 % (9.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12 % (13.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.6 (78.1) % (11.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (6.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.2 % (17.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 % (2.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.20 % (17.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 % (38.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6 % (6.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.5 % (5.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.5 % (7.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.2 % (15.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
17.2 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved