VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER BATESVILLE

GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER BATESVILLE

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER BATESVILLE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BATESVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BATESVILLE
State attribute explanation MS   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have MS
Street 154 WOODLAND ROAD / PO BOX 1469  
Zip Code 38606  
Phone 6625635636  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
130  (21.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
115  (23.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/20/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/18/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
115  (23.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/14/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/01/2009
date Of Correction: 01/12/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/14/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/14/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/01/2009
date Of Correction: 01/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.9 % (1.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (8.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8 % (4.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
64.6 % (20.06 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (12.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11 % (2.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (42.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.4 % (3.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.8 % (7.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.2 % (7.74 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.9 % (0.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9 % (20.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 22.4:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.3 % (1.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9 % (0.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.9 % (14.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.9 % (2.32 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.9 % (4.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.6 % (1.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76 % (1.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.5 % (1.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved