VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - PLATTSMOUTH

GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - PLATTSMOUTH

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - PLATTSMOUTH VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PLATTSMOUTH   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PLATTSMOUTH
State attribute explanation NE   vs 1.4% Nursing Homes USA have NE
Street 602 SOUTH 18TH STREET  
Zip Code 68048  
Phone 4022962800  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
111  (2.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
91  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
82 % (1.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/14/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/13/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
18  (10.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
91  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.49  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 01/26/2011
date Of Correction: 03/04/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Outside Ventilation Via A Window Or Mechanical Ventilation, Or Both.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/17/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/20/2009
date Of Correction: 10/04/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/20/2009
date Of Correction: 10/04/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/17/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/17/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 08/20/2009
date Of Correction: 10/04/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 09/14/2011
date Of Correction: 10/29/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.8 % (3.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.2 % (1.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 % (12.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.4 % (2.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 % (25.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (41.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39.3 % (14.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81 % (3.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 % (6.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 % (11.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.5 % (0.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4 % (20.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 16.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (5.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (6.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.9 % (1.32 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 % (19.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 % (35.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.1 % (7.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.1 % (1.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.7 % (3.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.8 % (13.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved