VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - REDDING

GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - REDDING

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - REDDING VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City REDDING   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have REDDING
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 1836 GOLD STREET  
Zip Code 96001  
Phone 5302416756  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
89  (19.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
71  (20.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
80 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/13/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 27  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
71  (20.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.52  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable Sound Levels.
survey Date: 03/23/2012
date Of Correction: 05/08/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/29/2012
date Of Correction: 07/09/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/05/2012
date Of Correction: 05/07/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/04/2012
date Of Correction: 05/07/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 06/12/2012
date Of Correction: 07/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/21/2012
date Of Correction: 07/10/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 05/30/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 03/21/2012
date Of Correction: 07/10/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/09/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 01/31/2012
date Of Correction: 04/10/2012 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors See A Resident's Plan Of Care At Every Visit And Make Notes About Progress And Orders In Writing.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/09/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 01/31/2012
date Of Correction: 04/10/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/31/2012
date Of Correction: 04/10/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 06/13/2012
date Of Correction: 07/12/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 05/02/2012
date Of Correction: 07/16/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 05/02/2012
date Of Correction: 07/16/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 05/02/2012
date Of Correction: 07/16/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 03/20/2012
date Of Correction: 05/09/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 01/31/2012
date Of Correction: 04/10/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.4 % (0.74 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (5.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.4 % (4.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 % (25.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
43.5 % (18.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.1 % (0.46 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.4 % (1.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.2 % (8.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 % (1.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 % (9.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (4.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 % (2.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.3 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.8 % (0.15 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1 % (8.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8 % (15.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
44.4 % (19.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.1 % (0.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
74.2 % (0.55 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.4 % (8.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved