VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - WILSON

GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - WILSON

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - WILSON VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WILSON   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WILSON
State attribute explanation KS   vs 2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS
Street 611 31ST ST PO BOX 160  
Zip Code 67490  
Phone 7856582505  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
50  (58.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
37  (54.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
74 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/16/2012  
Fire Survey Date 9/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
23  (15.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
37  (54.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.13  (0.36 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.46  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59  (equals average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 12/14/2010
date Of Correction: 01/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 12/14/2010
date Of Correction: 01/12/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.
survey Date: 12/14/2010
date Of Correction: 01/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/14/2010
date Of Correction: 01/12/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 12/14/2010
date Of Correction: 01/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 09/14/2009
date Of Correction: 10/12/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.3 % (6.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 % (5.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.3 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.4 % (12.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (12.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.2 % (1.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 % (2.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35 % (8.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (7.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30 % (5.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.1 % (29.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61.8 % (12.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.3 % (11.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved