VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOLDSTAR HEALTHCARE CENTER OF CHATSWORTH

GOLDSTAR HEALTHCARE CENTER OF CHATSWORTH

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOLDSTAR HEALTHCARE CENTER OF CHATSWORTH VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CHATSWORTH   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CHATSWORTH
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 21820 CRAGGY VIEW ST.  
Zip Code 91311  
Phone 8188828233  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
132  (23.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
116  (24.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/13/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/20/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
116  (24.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.28 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.19  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/13/2011
date Of Correction: 08/07/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
44 % (18.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (28.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
17.2 % (4.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.2 % (4.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20 % (24.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 % (9.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6 % (7.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
13.3 % (30.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.9 % (31.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
40 % (43.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8 % (14.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
45.7 % (20.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 % (20.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (61.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.3 % (2.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 21.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.4 % (6.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (4.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
14.2 % (24.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 % (20.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.9 % (20.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
58.8 % (15.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved