VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOOD SAMARITAN HOME INC

GOOD SAMARITAN HOME INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOOD SAMARITAN HOME INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City EVANSVILLE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have EVANSVILLE
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 601 N BOEKE RD  
Zip Code 47711  
Phone 8124764912  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
212  (103.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
189  (97.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/7/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/28/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
189  (97.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.05  (0.21 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.68  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/23/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/23/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/23/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 09/02/2010
date Of Correction: 10/02/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/23/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.1 % (4.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (9.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.6 % (0.06 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 % (27.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (42.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.1 % (18.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.4 % (6.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72.5 % (11.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (13.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21 % (4.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (2.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6 % (1.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.7 % (3.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.5 % (3.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2 % (18.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 % (13.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.4 % (2.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
71.8 % (2.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved