GOOD SAMARITAN HOME & REHABILITATIVE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	OAKLAND CITY	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have OAKLAND CITY
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	231 N JACKSON ST
Zip Code	47660
Phone	8127494774
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	103 (5.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (103)
Total Number of Residents	80 (11.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (80)
Percent of Occupied Beds	78 % (5.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (78) %
Health Survey Date	10/31/2011
Fire Survey Date	11/9/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Government - County	vs	2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County	compare Government - County Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	4 (54.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	4 (52.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	19 (11.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	80 (11.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.59 (0.18 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.77 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.36 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (5.42 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/31/2011 date Of Correction: 11/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/05/2011 date Of Correction: 08/05/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/23/2011 date Of Correction: 07/27/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 10/28/2009 date Of Correction: 11/12/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life. survey Date: 09/15/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 12/28/2010 date Of Correction: 01/19/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 02/24/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 12/28/2010 date Of Correction: 01/19/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 02/24/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 12/28/2010 date Of Correction: 01/19/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs. survey Date: 02/24/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 11/22/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 11/22/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Hire Sufficient Dietary Support Personnel. survey Date: 09/08/2010 date Of Correction: 11/09/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	38.4 % (13.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.5 % (13.16 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.8 % (5.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.9 % (9.73 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.7 % (25.68 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	5.3 % (38.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.8 % (16.22 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	31.7 % (52.94 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	34.1 % (49.84 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4 % (11.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	30.7 % (5.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	4.3 % (9.8 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.2 % (0.7 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	42 % (1.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.9 % (18.96 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.3 % (34.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11 % (13.76 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	23.5 % (57.94 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	25.2 % (49.55 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	27.8 (82.0) % (10.46 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %