GOOD SAMARITAN - LOVINGTON

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LOVINGTON	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have LOVINGTON
State attribute explanation	NM	vs	0.5% Nursing Homes USA have NM	compare NM Nursing Homes USA
Street	1600 WEST AVE I
Zip Code	88260
Phone	5753965212
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	62 (46.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (62)
Total Number of Residents	58 (33.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (58)
Percent of Occupied Beds	94 % (10.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (94) %
Health Survey Date	4/1/2011
Fire Survey Date	3/30/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Church Related	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related	compare Non profit - Church related Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	6 (52.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	8 (48.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18 (10.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	59 (32.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.93 (0.16 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.6 (0.24 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.53 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/01/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 01/17/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 01/17/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 12/27/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/11/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/11/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/09/2009 date Of Correction: 06/16/2009
Deficiency #7		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/09/2009 date Of Correction: 06/16/2009
Deficiency #8		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 04/09/2009 date Of Correction: 06/16/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/11/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/11/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/11/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 05/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/06/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 05/25/2010 date Of Correction: 06/14/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/09/2009 date Of Correction: 06/16/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 05/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/16/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 12/27/2011

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Special Eating Equipment And Utensils For Each Resident Who Needs Them. survey Date: 04/01/2011 date Of Correction: 05/09/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.9 (64.2) % (7.19 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	4.3 % (12.36 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	13.2 % (0.62 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	17.9 (64.2) % (6.07 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	54.5 % (9.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	16.1 % (2.64 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	9.3 % (19.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.5 % (6.56 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	10.5 % (5.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.4 % (7.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	14.4 % (5.18 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	48.9 % (5.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	11.2-20 % (8.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	11.9 % (1.17 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.2:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (18.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	14.7:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %