VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY-DAYTONA

GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY-DAYTONA

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY-DAYTONA VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DAYTONA BEACH   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have DAYTONA BEACH
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 325 S SEGRAVE STREET  
Zip Code 32114  
Phone 3862536791  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
99  (7.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
83 % (0.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/12/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/15/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 1  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99  (7.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 09/24/2009
date Of Correction: 09/25/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.2 % (0.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (29.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (4.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (8.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.5 % (3.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
62.9 % (18.36 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.1 % (10.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (5.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1 % (24.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.1 % (41.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
43.1 % (18.08 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.7 % (7.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.8 % (8.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (12.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.9 % (3.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.9 % (17.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.4 % (3.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.9 % (3.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
55.4 % (12.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (1.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4 % (15.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (7.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.1 % (8.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.7 % (8.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
63.6 % (11.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16.5 % (0.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved