VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GRACE HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER OF GREENE COUNTY

GRACE HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER OF GREENE COUNTY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GRACE HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER OF GREENE COUNTY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City STANARDSVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have STANARDSVILLE
State attribute explanation VA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have VA
Street 355 WILLIAM MILLS DRIVE  
Zip Code 22973  
Phone 4349854434  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
90  (18.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
81  (10.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/1/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/29/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
81  (10.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.77  (0.93 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.06  (0.47 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 01/05/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/14/2010
date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 03/03/2010
date Of Correction: 03/30/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 01/14/2010
date Of Correction: 03/30/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/05/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/14/2010
date Of Correction: 03/30/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 01/14/2010
date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.3 % (6.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.4 % (13.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4 % (8.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (13.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.9 % (1.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9 % (7.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.9 % (7.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.9 % (5.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (8.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (5.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 % (2.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.6 % (25.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2 % (6.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13 % (6.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.4 % (35.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.4 % (3.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
54 % (27.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 % (8.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved