GRACE HEALTHCARE OF PHOENIX

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	PHOENIX	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have PHOENIX
State attribute explanation	AZ	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ	compare AZ Nursing Homes USA
Street	4202 NORTH 20TH AVENUE
Zip Code	85015
Phone	6022643824
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	100 (8.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (100)
Total Number of Residents	75 (16.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (75)
Percent of Occupied Beds	75 % (8.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (75) %
Health Survey Date	12/2/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/6/2011
Sprinkler Status	Partially Sprinklered	vs	8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7

Staff Information
Number of Residents	75 (16.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.74 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.92 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.66 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (5.42 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/10/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/08/2009 date Of Correction: 05/01/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 06/24/2010 date Of Correction: 07/26/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/24/2010 date Of Correction: 06/24/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/24/2010 date Of Correction: 07/26/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 06/24/2010 date Of Correction: 07/26/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/10/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20 % (5.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	14.3 % (1.72 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.4 % (8.43 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	63.3 % (18.76 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.9 % (8.73 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.7 % (41.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	55.6 % (30.58 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	86.2 % (1.56 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	87.1 % (3.16 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.8 % (5.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	17.7 % (3.6 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	15.8 % (6.58 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.9 % (2.6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	61.6 % (18.22 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.4 % (4.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.5 % (2.08 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	51.3 % (26.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	86.4 % (4.96 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	88.9 % (14.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	22.2:1 %