VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GRACEWOOD REHABILITATION AND NURSING CARE

GRACEWOOD REHABILITATION AND NURSING CARE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GRACEWOOD REHABILITATION AND NURSING CARE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PINELLAS PARK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PINELLAS PARK
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 8600 US HWY 19 N  
Zip Code 33782  
Phone 7275417515  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
101  (9.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/11/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
101  (9.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.5 - 2.0  (0.27 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.78  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.28  (0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Adequate And Comfortable Lighting Levels In All Areas.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 08/19/2010
date Of Correction: 09/19/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 08/19/2010
date Of Correction: 09/19/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization.
survey Date: 07/14/2011
date Of Correction: 08/13/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 07/14/2011
date Of Correction: 08/13/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/14/2011
date Of Correction: 08/13/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
52.8 % (27.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3 % (8.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 % (5.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 % (10.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.5 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
10.2 % (33.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.2 % (0.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.2 % (0.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 % (10.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
48.8 % (23.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 % (2.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.6 % (1.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.6 % (0.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.6 % (2.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
26.7 % (6.84 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
13 % (25.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.7 (69.3) % (4.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.7 % (3.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 16.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.9 % (5.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved