VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GRANDVIEW HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

GRANDVIEW HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GRANDVIEW HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MARTINSVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MARTINSVILLE
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 1959 E COLUMBUS ST  
Zip Code 46151  
Phone 7653427114  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
82  (26.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
62  (29.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
76 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/21/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/5/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
62  (29.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.38  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (5.4 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/23/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/23/2011
date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 12/07/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/19/2011
date Of Correction: 06/06/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 01/06/2010
date Of Correction: 01/21/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 01/06/2010
date Of Correction: 01/21/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/06/2010
date Of Correction: 01/21/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 05/19/2011
date Of Correction: 06/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 01/06/2010
date Of Correction: 01/21/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 % (3.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.9-24 % (0.24 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8 % (2.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.9 % (37.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.5 % (12.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.6 % (2.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.1 % (1.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.8 % (7.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (21 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.5 % (13.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.2 % (2.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.2 % (2.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13 % (3.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.4 % (6.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.4 % (33.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41.4 % (16.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.8 % (1.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.3 % (4.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.6 % (7.26 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved