VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GREEN MEADOW HAVEN

GREEN MEADOW HAVEN

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GREEN MEADOW HAVEN VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City COUSHATTA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have COUSHATTA
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 1110 RINGGOLD AVENUE  
Zip Code 71019  
Phone 3189325202  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
157  (48.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
83  (8.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
53 % (30.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
11  (3.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
83  (8.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.24  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/23/2011
date Of Correction: 07/14/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/23/2011
date Of Correction: 07/14/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/10/2009
date Of Correction: 12/21/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 08/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.
survey Date: 12/10/2009
date Of Correction: 12/21/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/10/2009
date Of Correction: 12/21/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 06/18/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.7 % (9.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.7 % (0.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22 % (22.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.8 % (9.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 % (9.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
11.3 % (32.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (0.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8 % (11.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.5 % (4.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5 % (10.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.8 % (7.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (2.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.4 % (1.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.5 % (2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.8 (82.0) % (15.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.3 % (6.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.7 % (1.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.6 % (0.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24.7 % (50.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 % (8.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved