GREEN MEADOWS HEALTH CARE CENTER 1

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	MOUNT WASHINGTON	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have MOUNT WASHINGTON
State attribute explanation	KY	vs	1.8% Nursing Homes USA have KY	compare KY Nursing Homes USA
Street	310 BOXWOOD RUN ROAD
Zip Code	40047
Phone	5029557600
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	122 (13.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (122)
Total Number of Residents	105 (13.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (105)
Percent of Occupied Beds	86 % (2.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (86) %
Health Survey Date	9/9/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/7/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	3 (55.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	3 (53.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	105 (13.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.53 (0.24 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.31 (0.47 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.85 (0.26 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (5.43 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/30/2012 date Of Correction: 05/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/16/2011 date Of Correction: 05/27/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 03/30/2012 date Of Correction: 05/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 07/01/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 11/04/2011 date Of Correction: 12/05/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 03/30/2012 date Of Correction: 05/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 05/16/2011 date Of Correction: 05/27/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 03/30/2012 date Of Correction: 05/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/16/2011 date Of Correction: 05/27/2011

Automatic Sprinkler Systems Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Portable Fire Extinguishers. survey Date: 05/13/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011

Exits and Egress Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Exits That Are Accessible At All Times. survey Date: 05/13/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011

Electrical Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Installed Electrical Wiring And Equipment. survey Date: 05/13/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011

Emergency Plans and Fire Drills Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Did Not Have A Written Emergency Evacuation Plan. survey Date: 05/13/2011 date Of Correction: 06/03/2011

Furnishings and Decorations Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Exits That Are Free From Obstructions And Can Be Used At All Times. survey Date: 05/13/2011 date Of Correction: 06/21/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.1 % (8.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.1 % (31.85 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	31 % (14.34 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1.1 % (10.73 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	56.9 % (12.36 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	14 % (1.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	10.8 % (2.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.9 % (22.48 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.1 % (41.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	55.6 % (30.58 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.1 % (8.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93.3 % (9.36 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.2 % (11.32 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15 % (10.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	31.3 % (17.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.1 % (0.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5 % (3.5 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	52.3 % (8.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	11.7 % (1.05 % higher than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	7.8 % (12.06 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.50 % (37.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.4 % (6.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	55.9 % (31.14 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	94.2 % (12.76 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	95 % (20.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %