GREENBRIAR AT THE ALTAMONT SKILLED NURSING FACILIT

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Birmingham	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Birmingham
State attribute explanation	AL	vs	1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AL	compare AL Nursing Homes USA
Street	2831 HIGHLAND AVENUE SOUTH
Zip Code	35205
Phone	2053232724
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	95 (13.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (95)
Total Number of Residents	94 (2.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (94)
Percent of Occupied Beds	99 % (15.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (99) %
Health Survey Date	11/10/2011
Fire Survey Date	11/15/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Other	vs	1.9% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Other	compare Non profit - Other Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7

Staff Information
Number of Residents	94 (2.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.1 (0.33 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.74 (0.1 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.84 (0.25 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (5.45 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/19/2009 date Of Correction: 12/23/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 06/03/2011 date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 06/02/2009 date Of Correction: 06/26/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 06/02/2009 date Of Correction: 06/26/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 11/19/2009 date Of Correction: 12/23/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 06/02/2009 date Of Correction: 06/26/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.1 (71.8) % (2.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.5 % (2.16 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.5 % (0.33 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.3 % (13.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.1 % (8.36 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	24 % (1.02 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	21.4 % (63.24 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	12.2 % (71.74 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	5.3 % (40.6 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.6 % (7.92 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	24.5 % (0.89 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.5 % (4.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.9 / 9.9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	34.2 % (9.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	6.6 % (4.13 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.6 % (1.16 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	14.6 % (66.84 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	12.6:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13.1:1 %