GREENERY SPECIALTY CARE CENTER (OF CANONSBURG)

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	CANONSBURG	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have CANONSBURG
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	2200 HILL CHURCH-HOUSTON ROAD
Zip Code	15317
Phone	7247458000
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	140 (31.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (140)
Total Number of Residents	113 (21.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (113)
Percent of Occupied Beds	81 % (2.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (81) %
Health Survey Date	9/9/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/19/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	113 (21.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.74 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.12 (0.28 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.86 (0.27 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.2 (5.29 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.2 (0.1 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 04/06/2010 date Of Correction: 04/22/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 01/06/2012 date Of Correction: 01/27/2012

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/06/2011 date Of Correction: 05/06/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 08/04/2011 date Of Correction: 08/17/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 04/06/2011 date Of Correction: 05/06/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/06/2011 date Of Correction: 05/06/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident. survey Date: 08/10/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/10/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 04/06/2010 date Of Correction: 04/22/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/27/2009 date Of Correction: 05/21/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews. survey Date: 11/16/2011 date Of Correction: 12/27/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Clinical Record Information Safe, So That It Will Not Be Lost, Destroyed Or Used By The Wrong Person. survey Date: 08/10/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis. survey Date: 08/03/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 01/04/2011 date Of Correction: 01/21/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	24.5 % (0.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.6 % (32.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.3 % (3.36 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.4 % (2.18 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.7 % (1.87 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5 % (10.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.4 % (6.06 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.2 % (24.18 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	6.1 % (37.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	43.1 % (18.08 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	73.5 % (11.14 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	61 % (22.94 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4 % (11.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.3 % (3.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.7 % (23 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	14.5 % (5.28 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.9 / 15.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	45.9 % (2.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.9 % (3.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.1 % (3.48 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.5 % (16.36 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	7 % (31.53 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3 % (7.73 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	37 % (12.24 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	62.5 % (18.94 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	54 % (20.75 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	23.7 (74.7) % (6.36 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %