VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > GREENFIELD REHAB AND NURSING CENTER

GREENFIELD REHAB AND NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
GREENFIELD REHAB AND NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROYAL OAK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ROYAL OAK
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 3030 GREENFIELD AVE  
Zip Code 48073  
Phone 2482886610  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
151  (42.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
107  (15.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
71 % (12.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(52.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
17  (9.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
107  (15.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 11/16/2010
date Of Correction: 12/20/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/11/2010
date Of Correction: 10/15/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 07/09/2010
date Of Correction: 08/28/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/30/2012
date Of Correction: 03/09/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 01/18/2011
date Of Correction: 03/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/16/2010
date Of Correction: 12/20/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 11/16/2010
date Of Correction: 12/20/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 01/18/2011
date Of Correction: 03/07/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7 % (8.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4 % (31.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.4 % (8.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 % (6.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.4-2413.6-24 % (1.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7 % (21.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.3 % (39.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.9 % (7.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
35.8 % (48.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
31.5 % (52.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2 % (43.9 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (13.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.2 % (10.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 % (5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
54.2 % (10.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.7 % (5.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.3 % (3.72 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.5 % (8.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.1 % (34.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7 % (10.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.3 % (10.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
39.9 % (41.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
27.9 % (46.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
10.5 % (6.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved