GROVE AT THE LAKE LIVING AND REHABILITATION

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	ZION	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have ZION
State attribute explanation	IL	vs	5% Nursing Homes USA have IL	compare IL Nursing Homes USA
Street	2534 ELIM AVENUE
Zip Code	60099
Phone	8477468435
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	230 (121.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (230)
Total Number of Residents	188 (96.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (188)
Percent of Occupied Beds	82 % (1.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (82) %
Health Survey Date	9/22/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/29/2011
Sprinkler Status	Partially Sprinklered	vs	8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	173 (81.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.79 (0.02 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.5 - 2.0 (0.34 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.29 (0.3 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (5.46 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 07/05/2011 date Of Correction: 07/05/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/05/2011 date Of Correction: 07/05/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 08/17/2009 date Of Correction: 12/23/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Listen To The Resident Or Family Groups Or Act On Their Complaints Or Suggestions. survey Date: 02/02/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 02/02/2012 date Of Correction: 02/05/2012

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 04/04/2012 date Of Correction: 04/20/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 02/02/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 02/02/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Proper Treatment And Assistive Devices To Maintain Their Vision And Hearing. survey Date: 02/02/2012 date Of Correction: 02/23/2012
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 07/05/2011 date Of Correction: 07/05/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident. survey Date: 04/27/2011 date Of Correction: 05/12/2011
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 11/30/2010 date Of Correction: 11/30/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/30/2010 date Of Correction: 09/13/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 08/17/2009 date Of Correction: 12/23/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26 % (0.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.9 % (30.05 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.2 % (11.46 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.9 % (4.93 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	18.4 % (26.14 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.7 % (8.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.9 % (10.56 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	18.6 (65.5) % (9.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.4 % (40.28 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.8 % (14.22 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	14.3 % (70.34 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	14.3 % (69.64 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	28.6 % (3.21 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.6 % (22.1 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.4 % (7.7 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.9 / 9.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.7 % (2.8 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	14.6 % (28.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.8 % (3.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.9 % (35.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.2 % (8.56 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	22.4:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	18.3 % (56.45 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	4.2 % (13.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %