VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > HACIENDA OAKS NURSING & REHAB

HACIENDA OAKS NURSING & REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
HACIENDA OAKS NURSING & REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SEGUIN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SEGUIN
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1637 N KING ST  
Zip Code 78155  
Phone 8303793784  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
113  (4.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
85  (6.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
75 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/16/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/13/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
85  (6.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 19.4:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.5 % (3.84 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6 % (5.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.5 % (12.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (14.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 % (25.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
11.4 % (32.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.3 % (11.72 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.3 % (8.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.6 % (2.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.1 % (4.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 % (0.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 % (3.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 % (1.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.3 % (17.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 % (2.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 % (16.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 10.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 % (8.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75 % (6.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 18.1:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.3 % (14.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved