HARBOR BEACH NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	FORT LAUDERDALE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have FORT LAUDERDALE
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	1615 MIAMI ROAD
Zip Code	33316
Phone	9545235673
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	59 (49.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (59)
Total Number of Residents	52 (39.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (52)
Percent of Occupied Beds	88 % (4.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (88) %
Health Survey Date	6/14/2012
Fire Survey Date	6/13/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6

Staff Information
Number of Residents	52 (39.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.91 (0.14 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.5 - 2.0 (0.34 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.41 (0.18 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (0.01 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/06/2011 date Of Correction: 09/27/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 05/06/2011 date Of Correction: 06/06/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 03/04/2010 date Of Correction: 03/18/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 02/09/2011 date Of Correction: 03/18/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 02/09/2011 date Of Correction: 03/18/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/09/2011 date Of Correction: 03/18/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.6 % (6.51 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	24.6 % (7.94 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.8:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.5 % (5.33 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.20 % (13.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.1 % (41.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	35.1 % (10.08 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	51.2 % (33.44 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	56.1 % (27.84 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29.5 % (4.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.9 / 15.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.7 % (0.52 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.9 % (3.4 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	46.3 % (2.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.5 % (8.15 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.1 % (36.43 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	29 % (4.24 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	41.1 % (40.34 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	52.5 % (22.25 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	5.8 % (11.54 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %