Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
| HARRODSBURG HEALTH CARE CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
| Staff Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Residents |
108 (16.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
| Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.55 (0.22 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
| Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.69 (0.15 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
| Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.25 (0.34 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
| Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.11 (5.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
| Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.11 (0.01 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
||
| Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 02/04/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 01/11/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/03/2009 date Of Correction: 01/11/2010 |
||||
| Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/28/2011 date Of Correction: 11/19/2011 |
||||
| Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/28/2011 date Of Correction: 11/19/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/05/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 09/03/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 09/03/2009 date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 09/03/2009 date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 |
||||
| Administration Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 02/04/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 09/03/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 09/03/2009 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010 |
||||
| Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 02/04/2011 date Of Correction: 03/16/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 |
||||
| Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
30.1 % (5.01 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
19.2 % (2.54 % higher than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
5.2 % (7.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
4 % (7.83 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
36.8 % (7.74 % lower than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
0.9 % (14.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
6 % (7.46 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
5.9 % (22.48 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
25 % (0.02 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
87.2 % (2.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
84.6 % (0.66 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
||
| Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
28.9 % (3.51 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
11.1 % (3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
7.7 % (1.52 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5 % (3.5 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
40.4 % (2.98 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
3 % (16.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
1.3 % (37.23 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain | 19.1:1 % | ||||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
86 % (4.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
81 % (6.25 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|
||