HEALTH CARE CENTER-FORUM TUCSON

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	TUCSON	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have TUCSON
State attribute explanation	AZ	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ	compare AZ Nursing Homes USA
Street	2500 NORTH ROSEMONT BOULEVARD
Zip Code	85712
Phone	5207957892
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	67 (41.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (67)
Total Number of Residents	52 (39.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (52)
Percent of Occupied Beds	78 % (5.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (78) %
Health Survey Date	3/22/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/23/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	17

Staff Information
Number of Residents	52 (39.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.84 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.89 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.73 (0.14 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (0.01 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 01/28/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 01/28/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 01/28/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 01/28/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/26/2010 date Of Correction: 06/16/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 10/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/02/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 08/27/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 09/28/2011 date Of Correction: 11/04/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.3 % (32.65 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.6-28 % (11.42 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	98 % (13.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	97.4 % (13.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.3 % (9.46 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.9 % (16.46 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.3 % (23.55 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.8 % (15.54 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %